|
 |
Clinical practice
guidelines (CPGs) are defined by the Institute of Medicine as
“systematically developed statements to assist practitioner
and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific
clinical circumstances”. CPGs
have an important potential to enable a new paradigm of clinical
practice known as evidence-based medicine, which integrates
best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient
values.
Despite a substantial level of interest,
CPGs have yet to realize their potential to improve care quality
because they have failed to influence clinician behavior significantly.
One main reason for this is that most CPG content today is
text-based (e.g., documents, PDFs, charts), which require
the clinician to interrupt their workflow to locate, read,
and process.
Research indicates that computer-based,
patient-specific CPG content integrated into the clinician’s
workflow may be an effective way of overcoming this barrier
to quality improvement.
|
| |
Widespread distribution
of computable CPG content that can be instantiated via clinical
information system functions is currently prevented by severe
infrastructure challenges. Key among these challenges are
lack of standards for representation of medical knowledge,
and disparities among clinical information systems in the
way that information is modeled and stored in the electronic
medical record.
Solving this problem will require
a simultaneous and integrated solution to three significant
challenges in clinical informatics: 1) Creation, 2) Representation,
and 3) Deployment of shared clinical knowledge in the form
of computer-interpretable guidelines. |